ONE COMPLETE ORBIT OF THE ART WORLD.

La Tricoteuse, by William-Adolphe Bouguereau

It is an odd thing to hear astronomers prattle about how the world goes around in circles. It seems far too substantial and solid for that. When you stand on a rock, you do not feel it flying through space at speeds unthinkable: you feel it sitting there in one place, like a rock, the very image of sitting­there­in­one­place­ness.

Yet once in a while Dr. Boli has an experience that makes the circular motion of the earth strangely evident. One of those happened yesterday, thanks to William-Adolphe Bouguereau, the notable French painter. That we are able to call him notable is the thing that makes us feel the movement of the earth.

This curious mental journey began when Dr. Boli remembered visiting an art museum in Ocala, Florida, some years ago, shortly after it was opened. What was the name of the museum? He could not recall; but he could recall that it was on Silver Springs Boulevard east of the city. Google Maps did the rest; the museum was the Appleton Museum of Art, founded to display the collection of a rich fellow named Appleton, who snatched up a wide variety of art, including a first-class collection of Asian art and an important collection of pre-Columbian American art, but also some European masters. (And he also got his hands on the desk on which the Treaty of Versailles, the one that ended the First World War, was signed, because, you know, somebody has to own it.)

The museum site divides the permanent collection into several categories, and the painting chosen to represent the “European” category (the painting you see above) immediately struck Dr. Boli as a Bouguereau. If you know Bouguereau’s work, you know why: the idealized and impossibly clean poor girl staring straight at us is just his sort of thing. That first instinct was right: it was Tricoteuse (“Knitter”) by William-Adolphe Bouguereau.

In his lifetime, which ended in 1905 at a good old age, Bouguereau was the most notable of all living artists. Dr. Boli remembered when his paintings were eagerly absorbed by European aristocrats and American millionaires as fast as M. Bouguereau could turn them out. To own a Bouguereau was the infallible sign that you were a collector of taste and discrimination.

Then Bouguereau died, and within a dizzyingly short time, his reputation plummeted into the gutter. To own a Bouguereau was the infallible sign that you were a philistine. For almost the whole twentieth century, to admit to liking Bouguereau was a gaucherie from which one’s reputation as a connoisseur could never recover. When the Appleton Museum of Art opened in 1987, advertising the museum’s collection of European art with a Bouguereau would have been like advertising the museum’s collection of American art with a painting of Elvis on black velvet. You could have bought that Bouguereau in a flea market for fifteen dollars and a book of S&H Green Stamps. Now it is probably worth hundreds of thousands, if not millions.

The world has spun in a circle.

What does this observation mean? It means either that the art world has come to a cheering and long-deserved appreciation of the skill and talent of the best French Academic painters, or that you should be scouring flea markets for paintings of Elvis on black velvet.

Comments

  1. Occasional Correspondent says:

    Puts me in mind of that old rule, The Test Of Time.  How much time is enough time for the Test Of Time to have concluded so that results can be recorded on the Report Card Of Time? 

    I was thinking once on the trajectory of Bach’s reputation (Bach as composer, that is): During his lifetime he was regarded as the inferior of Telemann (&al.?) and this disregard continued for some long time after his death — 50 years? 75 years?  Fifty+ years would seem sufficient to settle the judgement of time — wouldn’t it?  During this time, a lot of his work was scattered, mistranscribed and otherwise ill-handled so that, today, there apparently is still doubt about whether Bach was or was not the composer of this or that piece. 

    But in the 19th Century, Bach the composer suddenly becomes Great and (so far) remains so.  The Test Of Time seems to exhibit a divergence by oscillation.  What will be Bach’s standing in the 22nd Century?  How about the 25th? 

    And, of course, poor Telemann got the complement of all this — on the rolling Wheel Of Repute, he and Bach apparently mark a diameter.  Maybe the 24th Century can be the Century of Telemann.  Long-lived Doctor Boli should still be around to see how it all comes out.

    (And I note in passing: Bouguereau seems suspiciously similar to bourgeois.)

  2. Occasional Correspondent says:

    And by the way:
    Was the “rich fellow named Appleton” the infamous Crabby Appleton, arch-nemesis of Tom Terrific? using his ill-gotten gains to build and fill a museum?  Was Mighty Manfred the Wonder Dog stuffed and mounted in the Taxonomy Wing?

  3. Maypo says:

    Bouguereau creates real art to my eyes. I’m forever grateful to a different occasional correspondent, Mr. Moore, for introducing his work to me.

  4. John Salmon says:

    Possibly too flippant, but Renoir sort of sucks.

    Not Thomas Kincaide level-suckery, granted, but way too pretty.

    He fails my Test of Time-the things I’ve liked during my long sojourn on this planet.

    As to music, there are those who don’t like Mozart, or Bach. Worse than being a Commie, frankly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *