WHERE WE WENT WRONG WITH PENNIES.

Evolution has wisely provided us with two hands because dilemmas have two horns. Without the requisite number of hands, we should all be at a loss for illustrative gestures when we discussed the important questions of the day. Of course, the process of evolution is messy, and doubtless many one-handed or three-handed creatures perished miserably because they could not say “on the one hand” and “on the other hand”; but Nature is prodigal, and the end result has been our own perfect adaptation to binary divisions.

The penny question has agitated many of Dr. Boli’s acquaintances. On the one hand, some thought the decision to stop minting pennies was long overdue, since it cost much more than a penny to make a penny. On the other hand, some thought it was the Beginning of the End. The latter have been more agitated than the former, and thus more vocal.

Now, Dr. Boli does not follow social media, and he has been meaning to catch up on the news but still seems to be stuck somewhere about the Eisenhower administration; so for all he knows everything he is about to say has been said over and over ad infinitum, and you might as well just go look at pictures of flowers.

Dr. Boli perfectly understands the people who feel cheated by the disappearance of pennies. Your bill comes to $19.82. You hand the cashier a twenty-dollar bill. You get a dime and a nickel back. Where are my three cents? your well-trained capitalist mind is screaming.

But let us take a long view of the question and see where we stand in history, and then perhaps Dr. Boli’s solution to the problem will seem obvious.

American currency is decimal, ascending by powers of ten:

mill ($0.001)
cent ($0.01)
dime ($0.1)
dollar ($1)

The “eagle,” a ten-dollar gold coin, is often mentioned as one of the original basic units, though the Coinage Act of 1792 specified “that the money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars or units, dismes or tenths, cents or hundredths, and milles or thousandths.”

You will note the presence of “mills” in the list—a unit still in use in property taxes and gasoline prices, but one for which no coin was ever minted, on the reasonable grounds that it would be silly. Most prices have always been expressed in cents as the lowest unit; in other words, with two digits after the decimal point, not three.

The value of money went up and down through the nineteenth century before settling on a remarkably steady downward course after the First World War, and of course the things we buy now are greatly different from the things we bought in 1792; so it is a little hard to make exact comparisons. But it would be very reasonable to say that a half-penny, the lowest denomination authorized in 1792, was worth more then than a dime is now.

And that brings us to our obvious and straightforward answer to the penny problem, which—as we hinted earlier—is mostly a problem of psychology. The difference between what we paid and what we owed is eighteen cents, and we get only fifteen cents in change. We’re being cheated!

Do you see where we went wrong? Our error was not in eliminating pennies. It was in keeping nickels.

We have already learned to do without the third place after the decimal point. Simply cut off the second, and the psychological difficulty disappears. Remember that a dime now is worth less than the smallest possible denomination when our currency was established.

As long as we have nickels, we need that second digit after the decimal point. As long as it exists, sales taxes and suchlike percentage calculations will cause that digit to mock us with numbers that are not multiples of five.

But take that digit away, and the nickels with it, and the mockery goes with them. Once again we have a coinage that perfectly matches the bills we pay with it. Instead of $19.82, the price you owe, if it is more than $19.8, is $19.9. Your change is one dime.

Doubtless millions would rise to defend the nickel instinctively, unable to face a future in which the face of Thomas Jefferson would not wink at them from their change purses. But if we can weather the penny protests, the nickel protests should be simple. Tell your congressional representative that we need to shave one decimal place off the usual expression of monetary value. Explain the mathematical principles involved if your representative is a bit fuzzy on them. And then relax in the knowledge that you have done your duty as an informed citizen. You may even take credit for the idea if you like; Dr. Boli has nothing to gain from it, and offers it only as a public service.

Comments

  1. D. Smolken says:

    Do any countries whose currency uses a decimal point use a number other than two? It seems like currency either doesn’t use decimals because its unit of value is not all that valuable, or it uses exactly two. The last exception I can think of was the British pound with its own system of non-decimal subdivision, but that went to two decimal points as well.

  2. I have been supporting this idea for years now: when it comes time to get rid of the penny, also dump the nickel, and just measure prices to the tenth of the dollar, and no further. But the problem is not the nickel. As much as it might pain some of us to have to explain to our post-nickel grandchildren what the phrases “penny for your thoughts” and “squeeze every nickel until the buffalo screams” mean, there’s yet another coin to be considered:

    The Quarter-Dollar.

    Probably the most popular and culturally significant coin in the land, beloved by collectors of state quarters and bicentennial quarters, that was fed by the billion into arcade video games and the final generations of pay phones, what will become of the Quarter when it comes time to knock a decimal place off the price tags?

    I suppose the best solution is to get rid of the one and five-dollar notes as well. Have the same four-coin set of sizes, approximately (just enough off to prevent re-use of old coinage). A one and five tenth coin, and a one and five dollar coin. A pair of two-tenth and two-dollar coins could be added if desired, but while travelling I usually found such coins (For Euros or Canadian Dollars) superfluous. The new one-dollar coin might come to have the cultural weight of the quarter, in time.

    Even if “Here’s a Dollar, Call Someone Who Cares” is a terrible title for a Country song.

  3. tom says:

    When I said a penny for your thoughts I didn’t realize there would be so many of them. And now my coffee is cold.

  4. KevinT says:

    Our friends in the 51st state have managed just fine without using pennies at all. But do we really want to be like the Canadians?

    • Belfry Bay says:

      Mr T might want to try counting Port Rich, Spanish Little Venice and USVI before annexing His Majesty’s Subjects who still sing about that time they burned the Executive Mansion.

      • And any serious Canadian annexation plan would have to bring in all the existing Canadian provinces and territories as states of their own, not try to lump them all into one state. But yeah, Puerto Rico and the other island territories should get statehood as well. Venezuela is even more of a stretch goal than Canada, and the kind of person screaming loudest for the US to take them over is also the kind who would balk at the idea that this would necessarily mean giving instant full citizenship to its entire population.

      • KevinT says:

        His Majesty’s Subjects must be quite uncomfortable if they have not been able to spend a penny north of the border. Do they need to cross into the US in order to do their business?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *