Posts filed under “History”

SPEAKING OF COOLIDGE…

When Calvin Coolidge decided to retire, he announced it with the terse message, “I do not choose to run for President in 1928.” He was on a fishing vacation at the time; Coolidge had spent much of his presidency fishing while things took care of themselves (or Andrew Mellon took care of them). So Pittsburgh cartoonist Cy Hungerford, whose seventy-year career included fifty years at the Post-Gazette, produced this cartoon, which conveys very well why a president might not want to run for reelection.

Our friend Father Pitt put some effort into restoring this image, which was found in a microfilm copy of the newspaper.

IS THIS FUNNY?

One of the minor inconveniences of age is that, after one has passed the two-century mark or so, one finds oneself laughing at things and unable to explain to the younger folks why they were funny. One even finds it difficult to predict whether anyone else will see the joke, because it is not easy to tell how much of the history one lived through is still in current memory.

Dr. Boli was browsing through the digital collections at the Library of Congress, and he found the use of this picture to illustrate this collection very funny. But he was not sure that anyone else around him would see the joke. Is this funny to anyone else?

FUN FACTS ABOUT THE SIGNERS OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

Signing of the Declaration of Independence

According to a document leaked from the National Archives, forensic experts determined in 1975 that the signature of John Hancock on the Declaration of Independence had been forged by Robert Morris, but the information was withheld from the public in the run-up to the bicentennial celebrations.

William Hooper, William Ellery, William Floyd, William Paca, and William Whipple formed a group they called the College of Williams, pledging mutual support in the event of an American defeat. William Williams of Connecticut refused to join, calling himself “overqualified.”

Arthur Middleton, who considered literacy beneath his dignity as a South Carolinian gentleman, had to be coached in signing his own name by Thomas Heyward.

Elbridge Gerry came late to the session and was forced to squeeze his signature into a hook-shaped space that he complained looked like “some sort of ridiculous salamander.”

Philip Livingston of New York applied his signature with a novelty ballpoint pen in the shape of the Statue of Liberty. To this day, no one knows where he got it.

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY.

Photograph by PTG Dudva, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

On this day in 1938, the Mallard set the speed record for a steam locomotive at nearly 126 miles per hour, or about 44 miles per hour faster than the average speed of Amtrak’s high-tech high-speed twenty-first-century Acela service between New York and Washington.

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY.

On this day in 1215, King John accepted the Magna Carta, or Great Charter of Liberties, setting a firm precedent for the rights of socage, burgage, scutage, waynage, selvage, and hostage that is regarded as the foundation of liberty in all English-speaking nations.

From DR. BOLI’S ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MISINFORMATION.

Illustration by Clarence F. Underwood.


Memorial Day. According to a ruling by the United States Bureau of Firsts and Superlatives, issued to settle a number of longstanding and intractable disputes among American towns and cities, Memorial Day was first celebrated on May 30, 1868, by 19,522 municipalities simultaneously.

ASK DR. BOLI.

Dear Dr. Boli: Reading over the United States Constitution (which of course, like all enlightened humanities students, I enjoy ironically), I noticed that, in the very terse and compressed language of the Bill of Rights, there is one amendment that comes with a preamble, almost as if the authors thereof had intended to establish some important context for the legal principle to follow. I refer to the Second Amendment, which begins with the words “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State.” What is the precise legal meaning of that preamble? —Sincerely, A Freshman Student of History at Duck Hollow University.

Dear Sir or Madam: According to the United States Supreme Court, the final authority on matters of constitutional law, the precise legal meaning of those words is “Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.”

This is not the only or even the most egregious example of superfluous text in the Bill of Rights. According to modern legal theory, the entire Ninth Amendment has no meaning whatsoever.

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY.

This day in 1625 was a memorably sad day in Great Britain, when the funeral of King James VI was followed immediately by the funeral of King James I.

IN THE MOOD.

Last week, when we were talking about the strange disappearance of Xavier Cugat and the Latin bands from popular memory, Dr. Boli named “Jimmie Lunceford, Glenn Miller, and Benny Goodman” as three characteristic “swing bands.” Our frequent correspondent John Salmon wrote:

Sorry to be one those “actually” people, but Glenn Miller’s band really wasn’t a swing band. It wasn’t exactly a cornball band, either, but it wasn’t remotely close to Basie, Ellington, Lunceford. The best bands were black bands like the ones I mentioned, though Tommy Dorsey, Goodman and Woody Herman were also quite good.

First of all, no one needs to apologize for being one of those “actually” people around here. We thrive on debate about the actual: that is, the objective truth. So if Dr. Boli disagrees with Mr. Salmon, he wants it to be understood that he is disagreeing on those terms. He thinks Mr. Salmon’s taste is impeccable, because Dr. Boli doesn’t like Glenn Miller much either. In the days when Miller’s band was at its peak, whenever someone asked “Would you like to go hear Glenn Miller or…,” Dr. Boli usually picked “or” before even hearing the second name. This did expose him to the danger of Guy Lombardo, but that was perhaps a lesson in patient self-restraint that he needed to learn.

But it seems to him that there is no objective criterion by which Tommy Dorsey’s can be called a “swing band” and Glenn Miller’s not. If swing music is four-beat jazz with space left for solos and frequent use of riffs, then that is what both of them played. They also played sweet music: they were not uncompromising like Lunceford or Goodman, who played even their ballads in swing style. But if one was a swing band, so was the other. The only conceivable definition of “swing” that excludes Miller and not Dorsey is Swing is music I like, and not-swing is music I don’t.

And now, as a little expedition into musical history for the musical fanatics, we are going to trace the evolution of Glenn Miller’s most-remembered hit. In so doing we’ll see how Glenn Miller radically simplified swing until it was pared down to a kind of essential obviousness that even today’s teenagers can understand. It was brilliant marketing; whether it did any favors to the music will be left for readers to decide. We’ll link to YouTube for every recording we mention.

The riff that forms the basis of “In the Mood” has a long history under different titles. It first appears in 1930 as “Tar Paper Stomp” by Wingy Mannone (more commonly spelled “Manone”). This is a small-group jazz recording, but with a Chicago-style four-beat rhythm that is already headed toward swing.

In 1931, Fletcher Henderson and His Orchestra, an encyclopedia of Harlem jazz talent, recorded “Hot and Anxious,” which uses the same riff in the second chorus and adds several other riffs. This is a stompingly obvious performance by Henderson standards, but it has much more variety than the Glenn Miller recording that plays in your head when you think of “In the Mood.”

The Mills Blue Rhythm Band picked it up for “There’s Rhythm in Harlem,” and Dr. Boli will admit that this is his favorite of the whole lot. Again, the “In the Mood” riff stands at the head of a procession of riffs and solos, but the band tears into it with such joyous abandon that we might wish swing music had never progressed from here.

In 1938, Edgar Hayes and His Orchestra recorded the riff under the title “In the Mood” for the first time, credited to Joe Garland, and for the first time you’ll hear that familiar introduction you remember from Miller’s version, but then—once again—a succession of other riffs. Dr. Boli thinks this performance is objectively better than Glenn Miller’s version, but it is more complex, which puts it at a disadvantage.

Artie Shaw bought “In the Mood” from Joe Garland, though as far as Dr. Boli knows he never made a record of it. By the late 1930s, though, radio broadcasts were often being transcribed, sometimes by amateurs with good home recording equipment, so here is a live performance by Artie Shaw of “In the Mood.” You will note that it is six and a half minutes long, because although Shaw’s band slows it down to a speed even slower than Miller’s recording, the Shaw version still includes a whole string of other riffs. It would have taken two sides of a ten-inch record if it had been commercially released. Shaw seems to have decided that it was too long and boring and didn’t know how to fix it.

And so finally we come to Glenn Miller’s “In the Mood,” and we can see what Miller did to it. He simplified it radically, eliminating all but a couple of the riffs, and returning to the introductory riff with some of his trademark trick stops to pound it into your brain. Dr. Boli will emphasize that this is not a bad recording. It’s pretty good swing music. It just isn’t as good as any of the others (with the exception of Artie Shaw’s, which Dr. Boli agrees is too long and boring). But it is much, much simpler and demands much less attention from the musical part of your brain.

Glenn Miller was actually a very talented arranger who got his start writing remarkable scores for the Dorsey Brothers. When he formed his own band, he thought he would finally have a chance to pull out all the stops and write really interesting stuff. (Listen to his “I Got Rhythm,” where he outweighs the melody with a flamboyant countermelody in the reeds—and of course ends with some of his trademark trick stops.) He nearly starved to death. Just before he and the band opened their last can of Heinz Vegetarian Baked Beans, he hit on the winning formula of appealing to the musical lowbrows, and the rest is history—proving H. L. Mencken’s dictum that no one ever went broke by underestimating the taste of the American public.

So, once again, it is Dr. Boli’s contention that Glenn Miller’s was indeed a swing band, and he does not have to like the band to say that. It meets the objective criteria of four-beat rhythm, riffs, jazz solos, and all the other things that make up swing as a style. It just isn’t Dr. Boli’s idea of good swing music. He will go back to the Mills Blue Rhythm Band for that. Mr. Salmon has good taste in the only objective way anyone can be said to have good taste, which is that his taste agrees with Dr. Boli’s.