Posts by Dr. Boli

A PERFECTLY GOOD PREDICTION.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Dr. Boli has famously made predictions about the future that have since come to pass exactly as he predicted. He is, however, candid enough to admit that not everything he predicts comes to pass. Sometimes, through no fault of his own, the world simply fails to see the inevitability of the course he has planned for it, and runs merrily off on a different track.

It seems a shame to waste a good prediction just because events have run their own course without it. One of Dr. Boli’s most reasonable and most certain predictions had to do with electronic books. More than a decade ago, he predicted that ebooks would become an important part of the publishing market only when the reading hardware had become so cheap that it was disposable. He envisioned a marketplace in which electronic versions of books were sold as dedicated units, book and reader, at roughly the same price as printed books.

Now, this was a very reasonable prediction. Today, one can walk into any store that carries electronics and walk out with an Android tablet for less than $50—about the cost of two hardcover books. A $50 tablet is anemic for browsing the Web and impossible for processor-hungry games, but as an ebook reader it works just fine. (Dr. Boli has read many books on just such a beast.) And some of the $50 cost comes from components that could be cut out in a dedicated reader—sound, capacitive touch screen, color display, card reader, and most of the internal flash memory, just to name a few. So the idea of technology improving to the point where an electronic reader cost no more to manufacture than a printed book was not at all outlandish; indeed, it seems to be vindicated by the event.

And what could be more plausible than to suppose that readers, accustomed to thinking of a book as a physical object that one owned, would continue to think that way? Ebooks would become popular when they no longer required a profound change in readers’ habits—when, in other words, it was not necessary to make buyers swallow an entirely new concept of “book.”

No matter how Dr. Boli looks at the question, he still comes to the same conclusion. Ebooks would not be popular until they could be bought in the same way books have always been bought since ancient times—as physical objects, in stores that specialize in books. If, therefore, history has taken a different course, it is history, not Dr. Boli’s prediction, that must be blamed for the discrepancy.

IN AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE…

…where magic works and AC outlets can be summoned out of thin air with a quick incantation, this warning on an electric pipe warmer with a three-foot power cord makes sense:

Do NOT use an extension cord to reach the receptacle.

WILL DR. BOLI READ YOUR NOVEL?

The number of novels published every year is so great that Dr. Boli cannot read most of them. Indeed, he often excuses himself from reading twenty-first-century fiction by saying that he has not caught up with the nineteenth century yet, which is strictly true.

Nevertheless, he will occasionally read a current novel. How, you may ask, does he decide whether a current novel is worth his time?

It may surprise you to hear that Dr. Boli can tell by the first three words of the book whether he will enjoy the rest of the novel. It is a very simple test: Are the first three words a character’s first and last name followed by a verb? If so, Dr. Boli will set the book aside unread.

Doubtless you will leap up to tell him how many great and inspiring works of fiction he has missed by applying this completely arbitrary standard. Probably you, the reader from whose ears cartoon jets of steam are erupting right now, have written a novel, perfect in every detail, whose first three words are “Zachary Mulligan turned,” and they are the only three words with which the story could possibly begin.

Dr. Boli will not contradict anyone who tells him that he has missed a number of very good books by applying his first-three-words test. He will only say that he has been spared an enormous number of very, very bad ones. When time for reading is limited, one must find a way of apportioning it, and Dr. Boli has found one that works well for him.

AND MORE ABOUT THOSE SOCIAL-MEDIA BUTTONS.

The quick update “About Those Social-Media Buttons” is the most popular article of the past week. Dr. Boli has no idea what that fact indicates about his audience, but he is planning a series of similar articles—“About Those Randomly Assorted Headers,” “About Those Sidebar Widgets,” “On the Use of the ‘Georgia’ Font in Web Design,” and (of course) “About Those Marbled Backgrounds.”

LETTER TO THE EDITOR.

Sir:

On behalf of all evolutionary biologists, paleontologists, and other researchers in related sciences, I feel it is my duty to offer an unreserved and wholehearted apology for the egregious error which my peers and I, through ignorance and more than a little arrogance, have perpetuated in the scientific literature for well over a century now.

I refer, of course, to the supposed theory, which we can see now is no more than a failed hypothesis, that human beings evolved from more primitive apes. I now see that this is the most colossal error in science since the geocentric theory.

Like other scientists, I was smugly certain of myself. I used to give lectures on evolutionary theory, for which I received some considerable fame in my field. But then, one day last week, a rather confrontational audience member asked me a question for which I had no answer:

“If humans evolved from apes, how come there are still apes?”

“Well,” I began confidently, and all at once I stopped.

There are still apes?

Why had I not been informed? Why had none of my colleagues been told? This one simple fact, if it were true, would strike at the root of the theory we had so laboriously built on the foundation of Darwin’s hypothesis of natural selection. But surely there could not still be apes alive! Surely they had all evolved into humans a million years ago!

Alas, it was all too true: with a simple trip to the zoological park, I was able to see living apes with my very own eyes.

Believe me when I say that I had never considered this possibility. That is the only excuse I, and literally millions of scientists like me, can offer. If only someone had shown me an ape at the beginning of my career! If only my biology textbooks in college had mentioned that apes still exist! It seems almost incredible when you think about it that not one single evolutionary biologist had heard of the existence of apes until just last week, but I assure you that it is so. If we had known that apes existed, then of course we should not have promulgated such a blatantly absurd notion as that they had evolved into human beings.

I understand that my excuse is feeble. I, and the rest of the scientific world, had the responsibility to investigate the question, rather than simply assume as fact that apes had disappeared. Therefore, I can only offer my humblest apologies to the many people we have misinformed in the past, and I trust that my colleagues will do the same.

I do owe an immense debt of gratitude, however, to that one persistent questioner from the audience—whose name, I regret to say, has escaped me. Without his elegantly simple question, I should never have known that evolutionary theory is built on a completely false assumption.

At any rate, it is clear to me that my life’s work is but straw, and I have an interview for an assistant-manager position at Hardee’s tomorrow.

[Unsigned.]

NATURAL HEALTH ADVICE.

Decapitation is usually best addressed with diet and exercise. Try cutting out gluten.

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This advice is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Decapitation can be a serious condition. If you suffer from decapitation, see your health-care provider at your earliest convenience.

ABOUT THOSE SOCIAL-MEDIA BUTTONS.

A few weeks ago, Dr. Boli added the ubiquitous sharing buttons that every other Web site uses everywhere, because it is part of his wicked plot to supplant every other Web site, a process future generations will describe as the Bolification of the Internet.

Well, in fact, he added those buttons because a number of people had pestered him to do it. Sometimes (but not always) taking his readers’ suggestions is part of the Bolification process.

The reaction was mixed; some people hated the buttons, and some people were happy to see them. The proof of the pudding, however, is in the eating thereof; and it is apparent that every day there are readers who are eating the sharing-button pudding.

That the brightly colored buttons were unattractive, however, Dr. Boli cannot dispute. He hopes that the monochrome versions now deployed are less distracting.

A QUESTION FOR FRENCH-SPEAKERS.

Dr. Boli has always sincerely wanted to know the answer to this question, which he will never be able to answer himself, since, even if he were to spend years immersed in the best Parisian society, he would remain firmly an American.

We shall phrase it as a multiple-choice poll:

When she sings in French, Josephine Baker’s pronounced American accent is…

A. charming.

B. grating.

Or, of course, there may be other options:

C. It can be both at the same time.

D. Hicks from Alsace talk like that every day.

Do native French listeners smile when she sings “mawn payee ay Pawree”? Or do they claw at their ears, but keep coming back because they enjoy looking at her?

There are probably very few native French-speakers reading this article, since it is in English on an English-language site. But perhaps a few Francophones will eventually stumble across it. As an American, Dr. Boli is unqualified to judge, so his opinion that Miss Baker’s singing is delightful, accent and all, counts for nothing.