Posts by Dr. Boli

RATING WITH STARS.

It is well known that, given the opportunity to express their opinion of a product or service, most customers will give top ratings for mere adequacy. For example, in this article about the “9 retailers with the worst customer service,” the very worst retailer is rated 71 on a 100-point scale. Most of the other eight are rated 75 or 76.

In a five-star rating system, anything below a four-star rating is pretty bad. Three stars is exactly 50%, which is dreadful, considering that—again—the worst-rated retailers were getting about 75%.

So when we see a “rating snapshot” like this, we should probably run as fast as we can from that product or service:

Rating snapshot

What was the product that earned such abysmal ratings, you may ask? Oh, Dr. Boli was hoping you would ask that. These are ratings for Microsoft Windows 8.1. And where do you find customers who hate Windows so vehemently? The answer: these are the ratings on Microsoft’s own site.

A BID FOR AN EDITORSHIP.

By Guest Contributor Fanny Fern.

—

I think I should like to be an editor, if somebody would do all the disagreeable, hard work for me, and leave me only the fancy touches. I don’t know how profound my political articles would be, but they would be mine. I think my book reviews would be pleasant reading, at least to everybody but some of the authors. I should have a high railing round my editorial desk, and “through the lattice” microscopically and leisurely regard the row of expectant men waiting outside for a hearing. I should not need a spittoon in my office. Nobody should contribute to my paper who smoked, or chewed, or snuffed tobacco; that would diminish my contributors’ list about right. I should discard Webster and Walker, and inaugurate a dictionary of my own. I should allow anybody who felt inclined to send me samples of big strawberries and peaches, and bunches of flowers; and I should get a fine library, free gratis, out of the books sent me to review. As to grinding the axes of the givers in return, why that, of course, should always be left to the option of the editor. Before I commenced an editor’s life, I should secure money enough in some way to be able to snap my fingers in the face of that grim ogre, “Stop my Paper!” I tell you I wouldn’t stop it. It is a free country. I’d keep on sending it to him. I’d always have something in every number about him, so that he couldn’t do without having it, how much soever he might want to.

Then you should see my desk. It should be dusted once a year, to show editors what a desk might be. My editorial chair shouldn’t pivot; there should be no shadow of turning about that. Gibraltar should be a circumstance to it. The windows of my editorial den should be scraped with a sharp knife occasionally, to take off sufficient dirt to enable me to write legibly. I should keep my best bonnet in a bandbox under my desk, for any sudden dress emergency, as do editors their go-to-meetin’ hat. Like them, too, I should have a small looking-glass for—visitors! also a bottle of—“medicine” for—visitors! I don’t think I should need a safe, as the principles upon which my paper would be conducted would render it unnecessary. My object would be to amuse myself, and say just what came uppermost, not by any means to please or edify my species. Now, I have examined all the papers that cross my threshold, and I am very sure that I have hit on quite an original idea.

If it stormed badly on publication day, I wouldn’t send the poor devils in my employ out with my paper, just because my subscribers fancied they wanted it. Let ’em wait. The first fair day they’d have it, of course. In the meantime, the printer’s devil, and the compositors, and the rest of ’em, could play chequers till the sky cleared up.

If anybody sued me for libel, I’d—I’d whine out, “Aint you ashamed to annoy a female? Why don’t you strike one of your own size?” I should insist on being treated with the deference due to a woman, though in all respects I should demand the untrammeled-seven-leagued-boots-freedom of a man. My object would be to hit everybody smack between the eyes, when I felt like it; and when I saw brutal retribution coming, to throw my silk apron over my head and whimper.

I have not yet decided upon the title of my paper. Children are not generally baptized until after they are born. Nor do I know who will stand sponsor. All that is in the misty future. As to the price, I should nail up a cash-box at the foot of the stairs, and people could drop in whatever they liked. I should, by that means, not only show my unshaken confidence in human nature, but also learn in what estimation the general public held my services. There’s nothing so dear to my heart as spontaneity.

 

Dr._Boli's_Anthology_Cover_for_KindleThis essay and hundreds of pages of other amusements may be found in Dr. Boli’s Anthology of American Humor, now available in splendid paperback or as a free PDF download. Look at the PDF, and if you think this book is exactly what your Uncle Vratislaus needs for Christmas, buy the paperback book.

FUN FACTS ABOUT THANKSGIVING.

Over the River and Through the Wood, by Charles Livingston Bull

The tradition of the American president’s pardoning a Thanksgiving turkey has been observed every year except 1951, when President Truman refused to pardon the notorious cop-killer Gobbler Gus.

The Pilgrims had originally intended to make a Thanksgiving goose the centerpiece of their celebration, but quickly learned that American geese fight back.

The Wampanoag guests at the first Thanksgiving were not nearly as thankful for their English neighbors as they politely pretended to be.

Thanksgiving was originally a harvest festival, dating from primitive times when food was not simply removed from plastic wrapping but rather grown in the ground—a much more labor-intensive and uncertain process, and one much more likely to require divine intervention.

On the day after the first Thanksgiving in Plymouth, six Wampanoag and eight Pilgrims were trampled in the Black Friday maize sales.

The American Atheists’ & Agnostics’ Association (AAAAA) this year has recommended that, at Thanksgiving prayers, its members thank Monsanto for a bountiful harvest.

From DR. BOLI’S FREE VIRTUAL ART MUSEUM.

Battle of the Cyclops Bands, from a manuscript of the late eleventh century.

A rebec-player “shreds” (to use the medieval term) on his instrument, while his opponent, an avistrangulator or bird-throttler, prepares to dispatch him.

Advertisement.

Adventurous scientist wanted to validate new theory that explains everything. I have discovered by intuition that all gravity is particulate, and that gravity, electromagnetism, and artificial vanilla flavoring are one and the same force, which is called allspice; furthermore, trees are listening devices planted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as part of a “dark op” designed to detect and clandestinely eliminate mandolin players. You need only design and carry out an experiment that will validate this theory, and you will be given co-author credit in the published paper.

DR. BOLI’S COMPLETE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.

CHAPTER 23.—IT TURNS OUT THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION LEFT SOME UNFINISHED BUSINESS.

—

It would be very easy to skip this chapter. One would simply say that Europe, beset by religious squabbling, descended into anarchy; by describing the conditions of any period in history as “an­archy,” historians absolve themselves of the duty of sorting it out.

Part of the problem was that many of the rulers of Europe had, politically speaking, a bad case of multiple-personalty disorder. King Charles I of Spain, for example, was also Emperor Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire. He was also Duke Charles II of Burgundy and Holland and a bunch of other places, King Charles IV of Naples, Count Charles III of Flanders, and a number of other kings, counts, dukes, archdukes, and margraves. Before he signed a document, he would have to ask a trusted minion, “Am I I, II, III, IV, or V here?”

Meanwhile, the pope was spiritual head of the Church, and as such was infallible; but he was also the temporal ruler of a large part of Italy, and as such was subject to beating up just like any other temporal ruler who got in the way.

The Holy Roman Empire was an unholy mess by the middle 1500s. It had never been very tidy, to be sure: if you want to give a cartographer nightmares, ask him for a map of the Holy Roman Empire in, say, 1450, and tell him you need it by Tuesday. But it was worse now because a large number of the kingdoms, principalities, duchies, electorates, cities, boroughs, school districts, and Amway territories that made up the Empire had turned Lutheran.

As Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Charles V (that is, Charles I, or Charles II, III, or IV) was very keen on upholding the Catholic Church and stamping out the Lutheran heresy. But he was also keen on maintaining and expanding his authority over the various territories that sort of more or less acknowledged his sway. (The German princes never reliably acknowledged the authority of the Holy Roman Emperor; he was a principle, like “justice” or “rule of law,” that the various German governments felt free to disregard when it became too inconvenient.)

So when it happened that Pope Clement VII, as temporal ruler, allied himself with Charles’ inveterate enemy Francis I of France, Charles had to beat him up and sort of accidentally destroy Rome.

Martin Luther, of course, attributed the whole thing to the divine will. “Christ reigns in such a way that the emperor who persecutes Luther for the pope is forced to destroy the pope for Luther.” If anyone is foolish enough to believe that Jesus has no sense of humor, let it be noted that Luther is on record as holding the contrary opinion.

The sack of Rome left Clement a quivering wreck who would do anything Charles said, and that would have some very important effects way up in England.

The Protestant disease infected every corner of Europe, but some corners were more resistant than others. In Spain, for example, the Inquisition was a ready-made immune system. The Spanish Inquisition had originally been set up mostly to figure out who was still secretly being Jewish or Muslim in a nefarious manner, but the mechanism worked just as well on suspected Protestants, who burned just as brightly as Jews and Muslims did.

In France, it looked as though the country might end up split into Catholic and Protestant halves, just as the Holy Roman Empire was. After a bracing round of massacres, Catholics gasped when the Edict of Nantes granted toleration to Protestants; fortunately it was followed quite some time later by the Edict of Just Kidding.

All these things are largely irrelevant, however, because we are coming to the point where History cares mostly about England.

Henry VIII was king of England at the time of the Protestant Reformation. He was the great friend of Catholicism who had written the anti-Lutheran treatise that earned him the title Defender of the Faith, and whose friend Thomas More had carried on the dispute with Luther involving the various shades of excrement as applied to theological disputation.

But Henry was not quite satisfied with the wife he had married and wanted to return her for a refund. Here, however, is where the quivering wreck that was Pope Clement VII put his foot down—although there has been considerable speculation that the foot was in fact put down for him by Charles I II III IV V VI, who was the nephew of Henry’s wife. The pope refused to annul the marriage, although, in typical fashion, his refusal took the form of burying the request in the Vatican bureaucracy forever.

Huh! Here was Henry, who had defended the faith when it most needed defending, and what did he get for it? The one time he asked the pope for a little favor, the pope slammed the door in his face.

Well, if the pope wasn’t going to do this one little thing for him, Henry would go into the poping business himself. To the loud clatter of jaws dropping all over Europe, Henry declared himself head of the English church. He annulled his own marriage and married Anne Boleyn.

She didn’t last long, either.

Henry had rather bad luck with wives, and English schoolchildren still have to put quite a bit of effort into remembering exactly what happened to each of them: in order, divorced, beheaded, died of natural causes, divorced, run over by a streetcar, shot from a cannon, eaten by stoats, ran off to join the circus, disappeared without a trace, and survived. Many of these favorable outcomes would have been impossible under the old popish regime.

Only one of these wives produced a son, and that was only the sick and wispy Edward, who looked like the sort of boy who would never amount to anything. All those women, and every one defective! What rotten luck.

Eventually Henry died of severe bloat, and his son Edward VI succeeded him. He was nine at the time and weighed about five pounds. After a while, Edward blew away in a stiff breeze, and he was succeeded by his sister Mary.

Mary was a thorough Catholic who brought England back to the Catholic Church and expected people to like it. Those who disliked it were burnt at the stake, which created a strong incentive for liking it. Mary chose Prince Philip of Spain, a good Catholic boy, to be her husband, so that she could have children and keep her nasty Protestant sister Elizabeth from the throne. Philip was a rather serious fellow. Some people thought that Philip had no sense of humor whatsoever, but they were proved wrong many years later when, on hearing of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (look it up in Wikipedia—we can’t do everything for you), Philip actually laughed for the one and only time in his life. He did have a sense of humor after all; he had just been waiting for enough Protestants to die at once to make it really worth his while to laugh.

Mary died of the flu before she could disinherit Elizabeth, so Elizabeth succeeded to the throne after all. Immediately England was Protestant again, and everybody had a good chuckle at all the Catholics who were caught without chairs when the music stopped.

The reign of Queen Elizabeth was the golden age of English literature: it was the age of William Shakespeare, Sir Philip Sidney, Christopher Marlowe, Edmund Spenser, John Donne, Ben Jonson, and—actually, you should just close this book and go read one of those guys.

It was also the golden age of English music, with William Byrd, Thomas Tallis, John Dowland, Orlando Gibbons, and a large number of other great composers you’ve never heard of, because our schools teach us that no one ever got any further in music than humming “Three Blind Mice” to himself before Johann Sebastian Bach.

History, unfortunately, cares very little for Shakespeare and Byrd, because they never massacred anybody to speak of. But Elizabeth also made England a big deal among the nations, and history cares quite a bit about that.

Philip, Mary’s widower, was now king and emperor: he already controlled Spain, Italy, the Low Countries, and Germany, insofar as anyone could be said to control Germany. England was just sitting there, and he might as well add it to his collection. The pope gave his blessing, declaring Elizabeth an infidel usurper, and Philip the legitimate king of England.

So Philip gathered together an enormous fleet, which, on account of its being an armada and coming from Spain, was called the Spanish Armada. With it he prepared to invade England. Queen Elizabeth got on her horse and told her valiant soldiers that she would knock Philip’s block off herself if he set foot on English soil. It was not necessary, however. Sir Francis Drake defeated the Spanish Armada by circumnavigating the globe, coming up on the Spanish from behind and scaring the willies out of them.

Defeating the Spanish Armada made England definitely a Great Power, which meant that one of the Great Powers of Europe was Protestant, which meant that religion would definitely be a matter of politics for the next few centuries, and if you could find a way to invest in the massacre business you were sure to make a killing. So to speak.

Catholics fared rather badly under Elizabeth, as Protestants had done under her sister Mary. Considering the relative lengths of their reigns, we must give Mary the palm for efficiency in creating martyrs, but it is true that Elizabeth treated Catholics as traitors. Considering that the pope had declared her deposed and made it the duty of every good Catholic to overthrow her, it would have required a fairly nuanced understanding of religious liberty for her not to treat groups of clandestine Catholics as terrorist cells. In general, we may say that Catholics did all right if, like the composer William Byrd, they contributed to the queen’s amusement, and very poorly if they had political talents that made her feel stupid.

Since Elizabeth died childless, and since she had outlived or killed everyone who had a nearer claim, the throne went to her cousin King James VI of Scotland, who thus became James I of England, another of those multiple personalities who infested the thrones of Europe in those days.

King James loved to think of himself as an intellectual. Actually, he was a sort of anti-Renaissance-man. He could do any number of things very badly, and he was appallingly ignorant in a broad variety of fields.

James was particularly proud of being a published author. Real writers, by the way, live in awe of plumbers and architects and other sorts of people who contribute something genuinely useful to the world; but James thought it was really something to have written a book. His proudest accomplishment was his treatise on demonology, a little book that set rational thinking back about nine hundred years. He wrote it in the form of a dialogue, just like Plato, if Plato had been a superstitious moron.

King James’ most famous legacy is the King James Bible, so called because James had nothing to do with it beyond being king in its general vicinity.

Nevertheless, James tended to conduct himself as if he were the guy who wrote the Bible. He was a big booster of a fashionable political theory called the Divine Right of Kings, under which the king could do anything he liked and Parliament just had to lump it. The argument went something like this:

1. God, who orders events according to his will, must have appointed me king, because I sure as hell didn’t get the position on merit.

2. You people in Parliament, on the other hand, were chosen by your constituents, presumably on the grounds of your superior wisdom, experience, and ability, which are all human standards.

3. Therefore, pthhhhhhht.

James also presided, figureheadatively speaking, over one of the most momentous events in history: the colonization of Virginia in 1607. The first settlement was called Jamestown in his honor, and it set in motion the train of events that would ultimately shift the focus of history from Europe to North America. These events are so momentous, however, that there is no room for them in this chapter. Sorry.

When James died, he was succeeded by his son Charles, who was even more thoroughly convinced of his own divine right than his father had been.

Charles spanked Parliament and sent it to bed without supper, but his discipline did not have the desired effect. Some members of Parliament openly began to suggest that the king himself was the problem. Not all of them, of course. There were members of Parliament who believed very strongly in the divine right of kings. After all, the more authority the king has, the less work there is for a member of Parliament to do, and how can that be a bad thing?

But there were some fanatics—many of them Puritan extremists who thought that people were having entirely too much fun, and the king seemed to be having more fun than anybody—who believed that the time had come for Parliament to assert the rights of the people, whether the people liked it or not. The only thing to do, of course, was to get rid of all the people’s representatives who were not properly representing the people. The remaining fanatics could then get down to the business of defying the king.

So the English had a civil war again; but the colorful Middle Ages were over. It was an entirely more prosaic era. Instead of giving it a lovely romantic name like “Wars of the Roses,” the English could think of nothing better to call this fight than “Civil War,” which just sounds like a bunch of people killing each other.

Actually, if we wanted to put an allegorical interpretation on the English Civil War, we could describe it as the war of the Modern Age against the remnants of medievalism. Specifically, it was the war of everything that was colorful and stupid about medievalism against everything that was dull and efficient in modernity. The royalist fighters were called the Cavaliers, which sounds all colorful and romantic; the parliamentary fighters were called the Roundheads, which sounds like bureaucrats-at-arms. The Cavaliers rode stately horses, wore shining armor, and fought under colorful streaming banners. The Roundheads blew them to bits with cannons. Guess who won.

At last King Charles himself was captured; the remains of Parliament tried him and cut off his head, which ushered in an age of democracy and freedom, which is to say an age of Oliver Cromwell.

Oliver Cromwell was a champion of Liberty, which is a technical term in politics meaning “the right of unhindered oppression.” Under his benevolent rule, the Puritan Taliban finally had the right to squash those evildoers who laughed on Sunday or ate a Christmas goose. England was free at last from the tyranny of people enjoying life; now the people were blessed with the liberty of doing what they were told and being afraid to smile.

As Lord Protector of England, Cromwell had a lot of protecting to do. He had to protect England from the royalists, who were always trying to sneak the son of old King Charles back into England to be king. He had to protect England from the Irish, who were over there in Ireland being Irish in a suspicious and provocative manner. He had to protect England from Parliament, which rather foolishly thought it had won the Civil War. There were days when it seemed quite likely that he would have to protect England from Oliver Cromwell.

On the whole, he was pretty good at the protecting business. You didn’t see any massive Irish invasions, did you? Not many, anyway.

Meanwhile, the “legitimate” king of England (meaning the one who had the properly decadent aristocratic ancestry) was over in France in the court of King Louis learning to live a royally decadent life. King Charles II, whose official titles named him King of England and France, lived for many years as the guest of a man whom he technically considered a mere usurper. One wonders whether Charles, when he recited his titles, mumbled with polite unintelligibility when he got to the “and France” part, or whether Louis sometimes humored him late at night by letting him park his royal pantaloons on the throne of France just for a minute.

Eventually, of course, Cromwell had to die, whether he liked it or not. Cromwell left his son Richard in charge, but no one had much confidence in Dick Cromwell. It seemed as if the Cromwell line had gone through the complete course of royal decadence in one generation.

But there was a perfectly good King of England over in France just waiting for someone to text him, “All 4 given come back 2 rule.”

So the English people, which is to say their representatives, who had outlived most of the people who elected them, brought Charles II back, and he set up a very jolly and immoral court that was the perfect antidote to dull grey puritanism.

The only problem with Charles II was that he was a closet Catholic. He was always conspiring with his old buddy the King of France to sell England back to the papists. Nothing ever came of it, except some bloody wars against the Dutch for no reason at all other than that Charles thought Louis might like it if he beat up on Holland for a while.

But then Charles died and his brother James II became king—and James was out of the closet. Everyone knew he was Catholic. The English people tried to accommodate him for a while, because after all having an acknowledged Catholic as head of the Church of England was not the greatest absurdity in the constitution of that august body. But when James proclaimed religious toleration for papists, England had had enough. Toleration for Catholics struck at the very root of English liberty.

It was time for a Glorious Revolution, so the leading figures of both English parties invited William of Orange, who was married to James’ daughter Mary Stuart, to come and take the throne. William had been very successful in fighting the English when they invaded Holland, which, according to the usual custom, made him an English national hero. William brought an army and navy with him to England, but he could have come with his upstairs maid and his charwoman and still won the throne—James ran screaming before he got close.

Thus William and Mary became England’s plural sovereign, and English liberties were restored—especially the liberty dearest to English hearts, the freedom to persecute Catholics.

The Catholic Stuarts did not give up without a fight. It was a pathetic, feckless, doomed-from-the-start fight, but it lasted for decades, and it did give Sir Walter Scott a start in the novel-writing business. We owe the Stuarts that much. Forever after, there was always some pretender from the House of Stuart claiming to be the legitimate King of England. Even today, Alvin “Stu” Stuart of Greensboro, North Carolina, grants free titles of nobility to anyone who buys four tires with lifetime alignment.

All these changes had effects far across the sea in North America, because England had planted a bunch of colonies over there. So it looks as though we’re going to have to go back in time yet again and sort all that out, doesn’t it?

—

The chapters previously published:

Chapter 1.

FROM THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE TO THE DAWN OF CIVILIZATION.

Chapter 2.

THE DEFINITION AND CHARACTER OF CIVILIZATION.

Chapter 3.

THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS, FURNISHING AND DECORATING THE AFTERLIFE SINCE 3150 B.C.

Chapter 4.

THE LESS MARKETABLE ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS.

Chapter 5.

THE ISRAELITES DISCOVER MONOTHEISM AND SPEND MOST OF THE REST OF THEIR HISTORY TRYING TO BACK OUT OF IT.

Chapter 6.

THE ANCIENT GREEKS LIVE THE EXAMINED LIFE.

Chapter 7.

THE ANCIENT GREEKS INVENT HISTORY.

Chapter 8.

ALEXANDER RUNS OUT OF WORLDS TO CONQUER.

Chapter 9.

WHILE ROME CONQUERS THE WORLD, GREECE CONQUERS ROME.

Chapter 10.

CHRISTIANITY RUINS EVERYTHING.

Chapter 11.

THE ROMAN EMPIRE DECLINES AND FALLS FOR 1500 YEARS STRAIGHT.

Chapter 12.

BARBARIANS EVERYWHERE.

Chapter 13.

CIVILIZATION DESTROYS CIVILIZATION.

Chapter 14.

NOTHING HAPPENS IN THE DARK AGES.

Chapter 15.

CHARLEMAGNE TURNS ON THE LIGHTS.

Chapter 16.

MORE FUN WITH BARBARIANS.

Chapter 17.

WHAT THE MIDDLE AGES WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF.

Chapter 18.

THE CRUSADES ARE WHOLESOME FUN FOR EVERYONE.

Chapter 19.

FRANCE CONQUERS ENGLAND; OR, ENGLAND CONQUERS FRANCE.

Chapter 20.

EUROPE PRESSES THE RESET BUTTON.

Chapter 21.

THE REFORMATION ELIMINATES EVIL FROM THE WORLD.

Chapter 22.

EUROPEANS DISCOVER AMERICA; AMERICANS DISCOVER EUROPEANS.

THE EDITOR OF THE PATRIOT.

By Guest Contributor Max Adeler.

—

Major Slott, like most other editors, is continually persecuted by bores, but recently he was the victim of a peculiarly dastardly attack from a person of this class. While he was sitting in the office of the Patriot, writing an editorial about “Our Grinding Monopolies,” he suddenly became conscious of the presence of a fearful smell. He stopped, snuffed the air two or three times, and at last lighted a cigar to fumigate the room. Then he heard footsteps upon the stairs, and as they drew nearer the smell grew stronger. When it had reached a degree of intensity that caused the major to fear that it might break some of the furniture, there was a knock at the door. Then a man entered with a bundle under his arm, and as he did so the major thought that he had never smelt such a fiendish smell in the whole course of his life. He held his nose; and when the man saw the gesture, he said, “I thought so; the usual effect. You hold it tight while I explain.”

“What hab you god id that buddle?” asked the major.

“That, sir,” said the man, “is Barker’s Carbolic Disinfecting Door-mat. I am Barker, and this is the mat. I invented it, and it’s a big thing.”

“Is id thad thad smells so thudderig bad?” asked the major, with his nostrils tightly shut.

“Yes, sir; smells very strong, but it’s a healthy smell. It’s invigorating. It braces the system. I’ll tell you—”

“Gid oud with the blabed thig!” exclaimed the major.

“I must tell you all about it first. I called to explain it to you. You see I’ve been investigating the causes of epidemic diseases. Some scientists think they are spread by molecules in the air; others attribute them to gases generated in the sewers; others hold that they are conveyed by contagion; but I—”

“Aid you goig to tague thad idferdal thig away frob here?” asked the major.

“But I have discovered that these diseases are spread by the agency of door-mats. Do you understand? Door-mats! And I’ll explain to you how it’s done. Here’s a man who’s been in a house where there’s disease. He gets it on his boots. The leather is porous, and it becomes saturated. He goes to another house and wipes his boots on the mat. Now, every man who uses that mat must get some of the stuff on his boots, and he spreads it over every other door-mat that he wipes them on. Now, don’t he?”

“Why dode you tague thad sbell frob udder by dose?”

“Well, then, my idea is to construct a door-mat that will disinfect those boots. I do it by saturating the mat with carbolic acid and drying it gradually. I have one here prepared by my process. Shall I unroll it?”

“If you do, I’ll blow your braids out!” shouted the major.

“Oh, very well, then. Now, the objection to this beautiful invention is that it possesses a very strong and positive odor.”

“I’ll bed it does,” said the major.

“And as this is offensive to many persons, I give to each purchaser a ‘nose-guard,’ which is to be worn upon the nose while in a house where the carbolic mat is placed. This nose-guard is filled with a substance which completely neutralizes the smell, and it has only one disadvantage. Now, what is that?”

“Are you goig to quid and led me breathe, or are you goig to stay here all day log?”

“Have patience, now; I’m coming to the point. I say, what is that? It is that the neutralizing substance in the nose-guard evaporates too quickly. And how do I remedy that? I give to every man who buys a mat and a nose-guard two bottles of ‘neutralizer.’ What it is composed of is a secret. But the bottles are to be carried in the pocket, so as to be ready for every emergency. The disadvantage of this plan consists of the fact that the neutralizer is highly explosive, and if a man should happen to sit down on a bottle of it in his coat-tail pocket suddenly it might hist him through the roof. But see how beautiful my scheme is.”

“Oh, thudder add lightnig! aid you ever goig to quid?”

“See how complete it is! By paying twenty dollars additional, every man who takes a mat has his life protected in the Hopelessly Mutual Accident Insurance Company, so that it really makes no great difference whether he is busted through the shingles or not. Now, does it?”

“Oh, dode ask me. I dode care a ced about id, adyway.”

“Well, then, what I want you to do is to give me a first-rate notice in your paper, describing the invention, giving the public some general notion of its merits and recommending its adoption into general use. You give me a half-column puff, and I’ll make the thing square by leaving you one of the mats, with a couple of bottles of the neutralizer and a nose-guard. I’ll leave them now.”

“Whad d’you say?”

“I say I’ll just leave you a mat and the other fixings for you to look over at your leisure.”

“You biserable scoundrel, if you lay wod ob those blasted thigs dowd here, I’ll burder you od the spod! I wod stad such foolishness.”

“Won’t you notice it, either?”

“Certaidly nod. I woulded do id for ten thousad dollars a lide.”

“Well, then, let it alone; and I hope one of those epidemic diseases will get you and lay you up for life.”

As Mr. Barker withdrew, Major Slott threw up the windows, and after catching his breath, he called down stairs to a reporter, “Perkins, follow that man and hear what he’s got to say, and then blast him in a column of the awfulest vituperation you know how to write.”

Perkins obeyed orders, and now Barker has a libel suit pending against The Patriot, while the carbolic mat has not yet been introduced to this market.

 

Dr._Boli's_Anthology_Cover_for_KindleThis story and hundreds of pages of other amusements may be found in Dr. Boli’s Anthology of American Humor, now available in splendid paperback or as a free PDF download. Look at the PDF, and if you think this book is exactly what your Aunt Winifred needs for Christmas, buy the paperback book.

 

NOTICE.

So many readers have asked for the standard array of social-media sharing buttons that Dr. Boli has finally decided to add them, in spite of his own reservations. If you have an opinion on this addition, Dr. Boli would be happy to hear it.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR.

Sir:

In this supposed land of liberty, freedom is our core value. Yet the very idea of “freedom” is meaningless if we are thwarted at every attempt to exercise that freedom. Here I am, an American citizen, living under what is supposedly the freest Constitution in the world, and I am consistently denied the right to drive on whichever side of the road I prefer to drive on.

I have many good reasons for preferring to drive on the left. I find it much easier to determine where the edge of the road is. I can safely drive much closer to parked cars on city streets. If I have business to transact with someone on the sidewalk, such as a newspaper vendor or drug dealer, I can simply roll down my window, rather than awkwardly lean across the passenger seat. I attribute the astonishing growth of the Japanese economy in the late twentieth century mostly to the Japanese habit of left-side driving.

But why should I even have to state my reasons? I want to drive on the left side of the road, and under a truly free system of government, that desire should be sufficient.

I am not asking for anything unreasonable. I have no wish to interfere with anyone else’s rights. If you honestly believe that it is in your best interest to drive on the right side of the road, then you should do what your conscience tells you. All I ask is that you extend left-hand-side drivers the same courtesy. Let the driver decide.

Is this not the land of freedom? Is not that liberty the very thing that makes America great? I appeal with confidence to the American people’s sense of fair play: I ask only the same freedom of choice that right-hand drivers demand for themselves.

Sincerely,
Quintus Adolphus Pfender,
Westwood

WHAT’S YOUR SIGN?

November 23 to December 21: You will tend to separate yourself from the mainstream for a time, but eventually merge back into the flow with little perceptible loss of momentum. Avoid men with clubs or fireplace pokers.

December 22 to January 20: Your bicoastal lifestyle leaves you with a certain ambivalence in matters relative to love, wire brads, and Manchego cheese.

January 21 to February 19: Though you have been moving forward with your plans so far, you may be forced eventually to surrender control of your own destiny, or at least to slow down to a safe merging speed. Your lucky number is 34,092.

February 20 to March 20: Important decisions hang in the balance. If you are on top of the world now, expect a sudden descent, and vice versa (i. e., if you are a sudden descent now, expect an on top of the world).

March 21 to April 20: It may be necessary to clear out some of the old rubbish from your life in order to make room for the new rubbish. Stick close to anyone with a squirt gun or spray bottle.

April 21 to May 21: At this point, continuing on your current course is your only option. Your lucky wine is Châteauneuf-du-Pape.

May 22 to June 21: Karma is catching up with you, and your only hope of escape is by following a serpentine path. Avoid cookies that begin with the letter O.

June 22 to July 22: Occasionally you need to be reminded of the first principles of social interaction.

July 23 to August 22: No matter what names people call you, you should not depreciate your own inner worth.

August 23 to September 23: Bonk!

September 24 to October 23: Be aware of your limitations, and do not attempt activities that will lead to embarrassment. Cut out this card, laminate it, and keep it in your wallet.

October 24 to Novermber 22: Considerable care is needed at this juncture, or your future may hold a long walk off a short pier.